No person likes to be tricked, especially by people they trust or have an expectation will perform the right thing, whatever that is. Fraud and corruption can be a blow to the self-image of in a position managers and their assurance in their ability to deter or discover a fraudulent scheme. More so, they can have a negative impact on an organisation’s brand, image and reputation, organisational morale and where the loss is large – significantly impact the results. fraud
In a recent survey of scams in Australian organisations, 84 percent of respondents decided or strongly agreed with the proposition that scam control is a governance issue.
Corporate governance is an entire culture that sets and monitors behavioural expectations intended to prevent the fraudster. As part of the establishment of sound corporate governance, it is currently evidently accepted that an organisation should formulate a fraud and corruption control strategy. Through the development and setup of the strategy, conformity with anti-fraud and file corruption error control practices can be promoted, maintained and instances of fraud and file corruption error control non-conformance determined and handled quickly.
What is a fraud and file corruption error control strategy?
This can be an extensive summary of important elements that the organisation features to prevent, identify, take care of, investigate and deal with fraud and corruption specific to its own circumstances. According to the Foreign Standard AS8001-2003, although an organisation’s approach to the strategy will be reliant after its size, variety, geographical spread and the industry in which it operates, the typical recommends that a strategy include a number of elements. Many of these elements are discussed below:
– Fraud and corruption awareness – Just how does the organisation instruct their staff and stakeholders about how precisely fraud and problem occurs and what to do in case it is discovered? This kind of is a key aspect as fraud surveys have plainly demonstrated over time that almost all scams are learned by personnel and that whistleblowers are also an important supply of information.
– Reporting of scams and corruption – Carry out they offer a formal reporting process? Does mature management and the Exam and Risk Management Panel get told of all incidences? If all occasions aren’t recorded centrally, how does management determine the size and breadth of the condition and effectively deal with it? Also importantly, if the instances if fraudulence and corruption are certainly not reported to the Audit and Risk Management Committee, just how do they monitor the performance of senior management in managing the risk?
– Fraud and corruption risk analysis – Identifying a few of fraud risks in your business risk analysis or enterprise risikomanagement process is far from enough. An organisation should not rely on management by itself to generate all potential hazards as there may be a knowledge gap, a reluctance to identify the existing weaknesses, inadequate share of time to go over the issues or lack of a persistent inquisitor to ask difficult questions and follow up. Therefore, consider having someone involved who thinks like a fraudster and has experienced a diverse range of fraud and corruption issues who can add real value to the process. The observations regarding risks and process weaknesses can be important.